Fraternity Hazing: Regulation or Absolute Ban

Rathiel

Legacy Member
A couple of years back, an issue erupted regarding the death of a fraternity neophyte when things went horribly wrong during his hazing. As such, people have been pushing for the complete ban of hazing rituals. The thing is, there are already laws in place which prohibit such hazing practices, and thusfar, the laws have been utterly ineffective.

Many of these rituals have gone underground, and only during the most unfortunate of circumstances actually get out to media. Usually, these are the deaths of neophytes.

Would you push for stricter absolute bans, or for regulated hazing practices, wherein no hazing can be undertaken without a licensed physician in the immediate premises and that an ambulance has to be on stand-by the entire time the ritual takes place?
 
So many have died because of the hazing of fraternities. One recent case was the killing of a college student who is into law school. The parents couldn't move on and they were always in the news in trying to find the culprits. After a month of investigation the police were able to capture the 8 guilty students who did the hazing that led to the death of the victim. I guess schools should ban not only the practice of hazing but also the fraternity. They should allow only clubs for student organization because fraternities are only in the guise of brotherhood but the real intention is to be a gang.
 
Back
Top