Well, since it's been requested of me...
I don't believe in God. :|
But that's boring, so I guess I'll comment on what some of the others have said:
Of course, i am leaning with the views from the Bible which unfortunately a lot of the so-called Christian denominations don't actually follow and fathom.
Do you stone your children to death if they're disobedient? Do you think unbetrothed women should be forced to marry their assailant if they're raped? Do you believe prisoners of war should be made slaves? Do you support polygamy?
Whenever I hear Christians criticising other Christians for not following the Bible it's ironically the more moderate Christians criticising the fundamentalists because they're such an embarrassment. I say it's ironic because those embarrassing fundamentalists are usually following the Bible far more accurately than the moderates who think John 3:16 is the only verse in there. The fact of the matter is that the Bible ISN'T a good guide to life, and if you were to actually follow its instructions you'd be a monster. The world has progressed since the bronze-age beliefs and practices coded into the Bible.
Life itself is a proof that we are being created as we are given the chance to live on earth.
Life itself is proof that there must be some higher being that creates everything.
My toenails are proof that there must be mole-people living beneath the crust of the Earth.
Confused? You should be. It's called a non sequitur - it means the conclusion doesn't follow from the premises. The argument that life is proof of God is also a non sequitur. Life is simply an event that happened, and by itself lends no evidence to the existence or non-existence of God.
If you think life is proof of God, let me ask you a question: what do you think the universe would look like if God DOESN'T exist? Justify your answer.
I was born a Muslim and raised as a Muslim.
You were not born a Muslim. You didn't pop out of your mothers vagina with fully-realised beliefs about Allah and his prophet Mohammad. You were born non-religious and raised as a Muslim. If your parents believed in a different religion there's a very good chance you wouldn't be a Muslim today.
Science may explain some things but not every thing.
Science can't explain everything YET, and there are arguably things that fall outside science's power to explain, but bald assertions like "God exists" explain NOTHING. You can't "explain" a mystery by appealing to another mystery. That's NOT an explanation. Religions do NOT offer explanations; they offer "plugs". They give you made-up platitudes to ease the discomfort of realising we DON'T know everything. The downside is that once people THINK they have an explanation they stop looking for an ACTUAL explanation. Your poo-pooing of science when it has brought you INFINITELY more comfort and knowledge than garbage spewed from the pulpit is inexcusable.
After all no body can precisely say what is God. It is only illusory.
If God is illusory, then aren't you saying God doesn't exist? That he's just a figment of our imagination - a mirage? Doesn't that make you an atheist?