Welcome to Atomic Academia

ⓘ The Age of Data
  • Dear Readers,

    We are delighted to present the onlilne collection of the Atomic Academia Annual Journal (AAAJ) and Preprint Journal (AAPJ).
    Our Triple A Journal (AAAJ) is an annual review of the most trending research. Popular keywords and trends are identified over the past year, and a short review is completed and published in December. Researchers who have already completed a recent review article on trending topics or themes are invited to submit it for consideration to be atomised and shared in the AAAJ.

    Our Double A Preprint Journal (AAPJ) is a monthly periodical for more experimental papers, they are not subjected to the same word limits but breviety is encouraged. All submissions must meet our editorial guidelines and use our templates to expedite inclusion.

⚛ Latest posts ↓

The Efficacy of NVivo in Conducting Literature Reviews: A Case Study on Defining 'Teaching Excellence'

Introduction
NVivo, the revolutionary qualitative analysis tool that originated with NUD*IST, a software introduced in the 1990s, is evaluated by Mark Warnes (2018) Conducting A Literature Review Using NVivo. A software application widely popular for its analytic proficiency with qualitative data, NVivo allows the user to extrapolate meaningful analysis from a large data set of textual content. Cited for its instrumentality in the creation of a digital library for literature review of scholarship about "Teacher Excellence" in higher education, the article is an apt case study of NVivo's end-to-end application.
Review
A qualitative analysis tool for literature review?
Since the 1990s, software tools designed to organise, analyse, and manage empirical research activities utilising complex qualitative data sets, have markedly improved. As Warnes describes, until recently the colossal challenge research analysts were facing was largely associated with the need to dissect representative variables from large volumes of content. As the article suggests, before NVivo collecting and disseminating a representative compendium of literature for review, began with the time-consuming process of summary analysis of each scholarly work cited before key variables could be identified.

Structured analysis made simple.
With NVivo, gathering research that counts is simplified. From the methodological standpoint, the software tool offers a comprehensive approach to both data collection and analysis. The NVivo's application process is nuanced, indicates Warnes. The software tool's sophisticated sorting and coding capabilities enable the categorising of variables from textual content before the thematic analysis begins. Warnes convenes with other scholars that NVivo eliminates the hassle of framing data for grounded theory interpretation, by detecting and identifying key concepts within the literature with tags (Paulus, Lester, & Dempster, 2014; Richards, 2009).

Scholarly synthesis in digital.
Creating a digital library is an essential step for any scholar today. When one considers the use of NVivo in the literature review process as Warnes recommends, and it seems the benefits outweigh the costs. Small wonder the software application touted as the best for qualitative research analysis, is the one that offers the advantage of enhanced analytical depth required by comprehensive literature review. NVivo expands the use-value of the literature review process, by establishing a digital repository capable of retrieving cross-referenced texts.

Implications for future research?
In the case study of "Teacher Excellence," Warnes suggests NVivo streamlined the data capture and variable categorised process, as well as increased the analytical depth of coded variables once defined. The discussion of findings from the study of higher education policy and practice using NVivo software for creation of a digital library of scholarship on the subject for literature review, supports the argument NVivo is a vital tool for academic research.
Conclusion
Warnes' article addresses the utility of the NVivo software application for literature review. As the article suggests, the popular analytic tool identifies key variables within the complex array of textual discourse for purposes of creating a digital library. NVivo reduces the risk of overstating outlier variables, such as alternative theories associated with a field of operationalized practice, hence improving the representativeness of a literature review's intellectual brevity. Warnes' evaluation of NVivo's capabilities gives credence to the argument the software application is a viable tool for enhancing the value of academic discourse.
References
Paulus, T., Lester, J. N., & Dempster, P. G. (2014). Digital Tools for Qualitative Research. Sage Publications Ltd.

Richards, L. (2009). Handling Qualitative Data: A Practical Guide. Sage Publications Ltd.

Warnes, M. (2018). Conducting a Literature Review using NVivo. Research Gate.
Credibility
An academic faculty and professional researcher since NUD*IST was popular in the 1990s, I agree with Warnes that NVivo has improved the qualitative data analysis process with effective identification of key variables from text content, also valuable for literature review. Also widely used for evaluation of qualitative data from primary research, the advantage is proficient extrapolation of key variables from the semantics of language. A wonderful tool for anyone attempting to improve the empirical precision of content analysis.
What is already known on this topic?
NVivo is widely known as a qualitative data analysis software widely utilized in academic research, particularly in the exploration of complex concepts such as 'Teaching Excellence' in higher education. Originally derived from NUD*IST, NVivo revolutionized qualitative data handling by transitioning from manual to digital methods. It serves as a crucial tool in literature reviews, enabling researchers to efficiently manage, organize, and analyze large volumes of textual data. 'Teaching Excellence' is a term commonly used in educational discourse, reflecting the pursuit of high-quality teaching practices. However, its definition remains elusive due to diverse interpretations influenced by academic disciplines, institutional cultures, and educational philosophies. The concept encompasses themes like pedagogical effectiveness, student engagement, innovation in teaching methods, and reflective practice. When employing NVivo in the study of 'Teaching Excellence,' researchers benefit from its ability to streamline the review process, provide deeper analytical insights through thematic and conceptual coding, and maintain intellectual rigor while saving time. This combination of software capabilities and a nuanced understanding of 'Teaching Excellence' contributes to advancements in academic research methodology and informs discussions on standards and evaluation criteria in higher education.
What is the question or concept?
The article explores the intricate concept of 'Teaching Excellence' in higher education and addresses the challenges of defining such multifaceted concepts. It emphasizes the use of NVivo, a qualitative data analysis software, as a powerful tool for conducting literature reviews, particularly in the context of 'Teaching Excellence.' The evolution of NVivo is discussed, highlighting its transition from manual to digital methods in handling qualitative data. 'Teaching Excellence' is unpacked, revealing its amorphous nature due to varied interpretations across academic disciplines, institutional cultures, and educational philosophies. The methodology involves creating a digital library using NVivo, including searching, collecting, coding, categorizing, thematic analysis, and grounded theory. The article details the advantages of NVivo in literature reviews, such as efficient data management, enhanced analytical depth, time-saving, and intellectual rigor. The culmination of the study results in the development of a more nuanced model of 'Teaching Excellence,' incorporating core themes like pedagogical effectiveness, student engagement, innovation, and reflective practice. The conclusion emphasizes NVivo's role as an invaluable asset in academic research, simplifying data management and contributing to a comprehensive understanding of complex concepts. The implications suggest potential applications of NVivo in framing standards for teaching excellence and advocate for future research exploring its use in other complex areas of educational research, thus expanding the scope of academic discourse.
What does this article add to human knowledge?
This article contributes significantly to human knowledge by exploring the application of NVivo, a qualitative data analysis software, in conducting a literature review on the multifaceted concept of 'Teaching Excellence' in higher education. The piece highlights NVivo's evolution from NUD*IST and its pivotal role in transitioning from manual to digital methods for handling qualitative data. The methodological approach, involving searching, collecting, coding, categorizing, thematic analysis, and grounded theory, demonstrates the software's efficiency in managing large datasets and enhancing analytical depth. The study unpacks the elusive nature of 'Teaching Excellence' by synthesizing diverse viewpoints, resulting in the development of a nuanced model. The article emphasizes NVivo's advantages, such as efficiency in data management, enhanced analytical depth, time-saving, and intellectual rigor, positioning it as an invaluable asset in academic research. The implications for higher education policy and practice are underscored, suggesting that the findings could influence standards and evaluation criteria for teaching excellence. The article also proposes future research directions, encouraging exploration of NVivo's application in other complex areas of educational research, thereby expanding the scope of academic discourse. Overall, this article contributes to methodological advancements in literature reviews and offers insights into the challenging concept of 'Teaching Excellence' in higher education.
Credibility
As a senior lecturer with extensive experience in higher education, I am providing this review on the utilization of NVivo in exploring 'Teaching Excellence' to share valuable insights gained from my years of teaching and research. My role involves guiding students and contributing to the academic community, giving me a deep understanding of the challenges and nuances surrounding effective teaching. My review stems from my practical experience in the field, using NVivo as a reliable tool to enhance the understanding of complex educational concepts. I bring a blend of real-world expertise and academic knowledge to this review, aiming to assist fellow educators and researchers in navigating the intricacies of 'Teaching Excellence' with confidence and practical insights.
Back
Top