The article presents a well-structured and comprehensive review of sustainable consumption behaviours and their critical role in managing electronic waste. It effectively highlights the pressing global environmental concerns associated with improper disposal, including pollution, health risks, and resource depletion. The study's focus on urban consumers, who are significant contributors to e-waste due to high population density and consumption rates, is particularly relevant.
One of the article's significant strengths is its identification of key factors influencing e-waste disposal and sustainable consumption, such as eco-literacy, subjective norms, monetary return expectations, and perceived behavioural control. The discussion of how these factors differ across demographics, particularly in the context of gender, adds depth to the analysis. Moreover, the emphasis on the mediating role of e-waste disposal behavior is a novel contribution to the field, addressing a previously unexplored research gap.
In my opinion, the conclusion is thoughtful and forward-looking, emphasising the need for collaborative efforts to address barriers to proper e-waste disposal, such as convenience and economic considerations. The call for future research to test specific interventions tailored to various consumer demographics further strengthens the article's relevance and impact.
Overall, the article is a valuable contribution to the discourse on sustainable consumption and e-waste management. Its systematic approach, insightful findings, and actionable recommendations make it a useful resource for academics, policymakers, and practitioners working towards a circular economy and sustainable urban living.
One of the article's significant strengths is its identification of key factors influencing e-waste disposal and sustainable consumption, such as eco-literacy, subjective norms, monetary return expectations, and perceived behavioural control. The discussion of how these factors differ across demographics, particularly in the context of gender, adds depth to the analysis. Moreover, the emphasis on the mediating role of e-waste disposal behavior is a novel contribution to the field, addressing a previously unexplored research gap.
In my opinion, the conclusion is thoughtful and forward-looking, emphasising the need for collaborative efforts to address barriers to proper e-waste disposal, such as convenience and economic considerations. The call for future research to test specific interventions tailored to various consumer demographics further strengthens the article's relevance and impact.
Overall, the article is a valuable contribution to the discourse on sustainable consumption and e-waste management. Its systematic approach, insightful findings, and actionable recommendations make it a useful resource for academics, policymakers, and practitioners working towards a circular economy and sustainable urban living.