Putting Self in the Basket of Transformative Learning: Reflection of Govinda

Professionally, I have been engaging with the professionals of I/NGOs for more than a decade. I conceived that the different types of reflections are the means of transformative learning. Practically, we have been practicing reflection in many ways for the meaningful execution of the activities and as the means of transformation. For this we call a meeting for discussion, presenting our views, commenting on each other, and applying principles like; thesis, antithesis, and synthesis.

These all are forms of reflective practice to move towards somehow transformative learning. In another way, we can link transformative learning again with reflective practice as a 'way of questioning'. We ask questions about whatever we are doing to reach reality and contextuality. In these ways, we reflect by asking; What went or went well, what /did I/we learn? What is/was easy? How can we be transformed? What is/was the difficulty? What do I need to learn more about? How can we mitigate the challenges? How can I/We improve in the future? (Rushton & Suter, 2012).

Whatever the prior knowledge and skills applied in professional lives are now realized, they should be modified and move through the different lenses of transformative learning. The classes and courses of MPhil STEAM Education added some more views on how we can step up for the recognition of the locality and develop that mechanism which can connect the local to global and global to local, enlarged the strengths to critique self, existing ideologies and brought differential eyes to see the world and perspectives. Transformational learning seeks contextual scenarios and builds that capacity where people can cope and adjust whatever the situation but deal with long-term impact.