- Co-authors
- Sarita Yadav, Priska Bastola, Sudarsan Limbu
Metamorphosis of Sudarsan: A Journey of Transformation
By profession, I am a science teacher who advocates for the constructivist/facilitative approach to teaching. As of now, I have numerous experiences in science education and find myself better than the previous. Here, finding oneself in a better world is what we normally call transformation which comes through comprehensive and critical processes. Transforming from executive teacher to facilitative teacher was not easy for me, I used to be so absolutist and employed the conventional way of teaching where the classroom control power was fully under me and the space for students' choices and voices was so rare. My transformation process began with the intervention of perception and practices from his professor and senior colleagues after joining the Master in Philosophy (MPhil) program at Kathmandu University School of Education.
My practices were often criticized and received feedback and the intervention proceeded slowly. At that moment, I seriously felt in a dilemma over his existing teaching practices like students are learning, rote-memorization, and performing well at exams according to the needs of institutions and guardians though criticizing for what? Continuing to address the perpetual intervened approach to teaching, I found it easy to deliver the content; in contrast to lecturing the whole period, I started to assign students for the presentation and discussion. Then after I opened the space for students' voices and choices of learning, I encouraged students to be involved in the discussion, collaboration, and peer evaluation through content presentation or hands-on activities in the maker space.
These days, I am more of a facilitator and less of a lecturer in my classroom, and similarly to my students, first I take preliminary knowledge/ideas from students and then intervene in the case necessary to find a new way of knowing/ideas.
My practices were often criticized and received feedback and the intervention proceeded slowly. At that moment, I seriously felt in a dilemma over his existing teaching practices like students are learning, rote-memorization, and performing well at exams according to the needs of institutions and guardians though criticizing for what? Continuing to address the perpetual intervened approach to teaching, I found it easy to deliver the content; in contrast to lecturing the whole period, I started to assign students for the presentation and discussion. Then after I opened the space for students' voices and choices of learning, I encouraged students to be involved in the discussion, collaboration, and peer evaluation through content presentation or hands-on activities in the maker space.
These days, I am more of a facilitator and less of a lecturer in my classroom, and similarly to my students, first I take preliminary knowledge/ideas from students and then intervene in the case necessary to find a new way of knowing/ideas.