- Co-authors
- Sarita Yadav, Priska Bastola, Sudarsan Limbu
Conclusion
The major notion to be developed for Transformative Learning Theory is to change the frame of references to the best fit as Mezirow's concerns, where one can disempower the hegemonic and misconceptions to assimilate the empowering new information and beliefs and lead to the practices ensure the transformation (Mezirow, 1997). In the teaching and learning process, this belief fosters critical thinking over the status quo once aware of disempowering beliefs and practices leading to assumptions and hypothesis-generating to find new ways of knowing through the lived experience upon test and re-test on experimentation. The classroom settings turn to constructivist and post-modernism designs where power-sharing, voices and choices, and active participation are uniform among teachers and students.
In daily professional and personal life, we are hooked up with this theory directly or indirectly to find ourselves in a better world. From the reflection section, it can be claimed that critical discourse, self-reflection, posing/probing queries to the existing beliefs and practices, and intervening in such practices by pundits are the key elements for the transformation. The central point from all the above reflections is escaping from the respective comfort zones; after the self-realization of carrying expired or unfit conceptions over the current frame of reference and finding themselves in a better world today.
However, Jones (2014) critiques the Transformative Learning Theory as being too individualistic and focusing too much on cognitive processes that do not account for the social-cultural context, and emotional and affection aspects during the learning process. In addition, the critical discoursing phase is a more struggling part where one can lose the temper or interest in transforming due to the over-glued in the comfort zone.
Despite these challenges, transformative learning theory remains an important framework for understanding adult learning, professional development, and finding the best ways of understanding and has been used to inform educational practice in a variety of contexts.
In daily professional and personal life, we are hooked up with this theory directly or indirectly to find ourselves in a better world. From the reflection section, it can be claimed that critical discourse, self-reflection, posing/probing queries to the existing beliefs and practices, and intervening in such practices by pundits are the key elements for the transformation. The central point from all the above reflections is escaping from the respective comfort zones; after the self-realization of carrying expired or unfit conceptions over the current frame of reference and finding themselves in a better world today.
However, Jones (2014) critiques the Transformative Learning Theory as being too individualistic and focusing too much on cognitive processes that do not account for the social-cultural context, and emotional and affection aspects during the learning process. In addition, the critical discoursing phase is a more struggling part where one can lose the temper or interest in transforming due to the over-glued in the comfort zone.
Despite these challenges, transformative learning theory remains an important framework for understanding adult learning, professional development, and finding the best ways of understanding and has been used to inform educational practice in a variety of contexts.